Hit from behind stopped at red light causing me to hit car in front of me? - whiplash from in front
Recently, I was from the back of an average car at a red light makes me jump into the car taken from me. Most damage is to the front of my car, in the rear bumper of the car crashed in front of me. Do not use my bags, but my hood is crunched in substance during the accident, he suffered whiplash, and hit his face on the steering wheel.
This has a negative effect (on my insurance even if the other driver is at fault)?
Can I 100% damage irresponsible of the car in front of me?
Friday, February 5, 2010
Whiplash From In Front Hit From Behind Stopped At Red Light Causing Me To Hit Car In Front Of Me?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
14 comments:
I'm not sure what you are in Texas, but if you stand behind someone at a traffic light and you're done, and is directly through the car accident before she broke the fault of the car that almost hit 98% of the time. The reasoning behind this is that you were stopped directly behind the vehicle ahead. Think you give out the book in the hand or Drivers Drivers Ed, if you do not see on the rear tires of a vehicle in front of the bumper or at least very close! Hopefully a lesson is learned.
Sorry for the injuries that occur more frequently by the person who contests that have affected and guilty for the damage caused to you were. Good luck and I hope you feel better.
Update of the Council, taking into account further information:
Get the police report and study it carefully to see who is the official misconduct, and be aware of the details of the report. Claims adjusters not say they do not, they may have pressed the brake pedal hard enough. Make sure you standhis statement in which they were held not give a sufficient distance behind the vehicle in front of you and a little about it. If you arm with enough information and keep their guns, which have good chances to be found blameless. Good luck.
They should not be with the salt, because the car is affected you what I think, but you should call your company and take it with them insurince ...
Insurance course or get .... di-or MAK if Apólice ??????
Check the police report, it should list who is to blame. The incident took place, as you said, the police should either collision as an incident. Air bags work on a boost switch, which is de-acceleration of his car at a rate in a period of time, or established 100 meters per second per second, depending on the vehicle manufacturer. How to call for your insurance and talk to them. If they say it's not their fault, is not likely to raise prices. However, if one considers intentionally or take partial fault, may increase your rates. The same goes for the third charge for the car.
That was Got a day? According to Who's to blame?
It seems inexplicable that you know what we were told.
Additional Comments:
From what he told us, this should not be responsible for this.
I'd bet on him.
Can you test whether you hit the front car - or were pushed into the car ahead of you. Both show that they are forced into it, the person who made you to be responsible for damages.
No impact on your insurance - that the accident was not your fault.
I was behind last June from an Infiniti Q45 1997 (by a 16-year-old hit) led and pushed me into a Honda Civic 2006th I was driving a Chevrolet Malibu 2002 was a total loss.
The accident occurred in Illinois, and I have State Farm and the girl to me (so was the car her father, and insurance) that had State Farm and the woman, you strike a name uninsured.
The application of local laws, wrote to three page report on an accident that was not cited, or charged a fine, but it's the police that the report and decide to blame insurance companies, that said it all.
I had to pay my deductible, and I was initially told that he want to get back when the girl who can be responsible to meet me. There have lasted 4 months, but he gave me my insurance deductible, in fact, not increased, after my car took a loss in the coming months and it took until my solution and then buy a new car, I would not for my Insurance paid until I replace my car.
They should not be responsible for ensuring all that, but thatPolice that a general and had a good insurance, (my neighbor, a similar accident and was injured and) not to work, and he always tries to resolve his case, but was not sure whether the name.
Good luck.
Drivers who pay for two cars hit collapsed HIS. I DO NOT SEE HOW THEY highest rates, provided that is at fault.
They are partly, as the car in the vicinity of guilt, where the front and you love it stopped when should the lights, you had the parking brake to prevent it in such an incident occurs
The vehicle, are concerned that you be responsible for damage to your vehicle. both the major damage caused by stroke, and secondary damage as a result, the damage included at the front. Damage to the car, refused to have is to sell it. If you take the car back together, and the damages to be paid there, and until it stops. This seems to be how it works in every state that I know anyway. If you are in an area without guilt, could be different.
For a definitive answer, ask your agent.
It was too close to the vehicle ahead so that your insurance covers it.
OK, provided that this does not explain how the work the car will pay all losses and damages on the vehicle in advance that hit.
This does not happen often in different ways, but basically you can say who the car was in front of you, then hit the back of the car. If the evidence supports this (with great frontal damage does not help here), then this is the way it is sold through another company and changing management could.
If Option 1 is what is happening, and do not use their insurance coverage, but the report as required by the policy as a loss not to blame, should have no bearing on your policy. If your insurance company pay for the car in front of you (for example) the remote possibility, then it is likely that the growth rate. "What if" scenarios are just that, and depending on how the investigation goes, anything can happen.
Every time that, the security have to pay sticker for the loss of time or are not their fault that can increase their prices.
It is understood by your insurance card in most states. Not as "acccident is at fault, but still against you (count in most states) for the game, regardless of who is to blame. And NO, not your fault (99% sure). The damage to his vehicle and the vehicle before you hit the person that was taken while he was stumbling are driven into the car ahead of you. The fact that you were sitting at the time of the accident, and not even move, delete them completely until all the windows of the opportunity to evade their responsibilities. NOW - the catch 22 ... If no insurance, accident insurance, you must file, but there is still is not your fault, you pay your insurance deductible and go after him (in legal terms, on request) compensation. If the insurance is legitimate and then set your car and you do not have to pay your insurance deductible business takes care of everything. So, yes, many of the states, you can still have a slight increase in their insurance. It is important ... in the state laws ... .. points SYMother ... whether or not to ... Just remember that if it affects your insurance and if your driving record does not necessarily mean that the same question.
Post a Comment